CUSTOMER SATISFCATION WITH VEHICLE AFTER-SALES SERVICE IN THE PHILIPPINES IMPROVES CONSIDERABLY IN 2012

Chevrolet Ranks Highest in Customer Satisfaction
with After-Sales Service for a Second Consecutive Year

SINGAPORE: 27 July 2012 – Overall satisfaction with authorized dealer customer service in the Philippines has increased by 25 points, compared with 2011, to 821 on a 1,000-pointscale, according to the J.D. Power Asia Pacific 2012 Philippines Customer Service Index (CSI) Study SM released today.

Now in its 12th year, the study examines five factors that contribute to overall satisfaction of vehicle owners who visit an authorized service center for maintenance or repair work during the first 12 to 24 months of ownership.

They are (listed in order of importance): service quality, vehicle pick-up, service initiation, service advisor, and service facility. Chevrolet ranks highest for a second consecutive year with an overall index core of 836 and performs particularly well in the service quality and service advisor factors. Nissan (832) and Mazda (831) rank second and third, respectively. Nissan performs well in the vehicle pick-up factor, while Mazda performs well in the service initiation and service facility factors.

Of the 11 brands ranked in the 2012 study, eight improve, compared with 2011. Mitsubishi improves by 40 index points, followed by Hyundai (+37) index points and Honda (+35 points). “Customer satisfaction with automakers in the Philippines is increasing, and they are working together with their dealer networks toward delivering a better service experience to their customers,” said Mohit Arora, executive director at J.D. Power Asia Pacific, Singapore. “This materializes in a growing proportion of customers who are “delighted” and “pleased” with the after-sales service experience at authorized vehicle service centers, 83 percent combined. In parallel, overall satisfaction with vehicle quality has improved, which is supported by several new product launches in recent years.”

The study also finds that providing accurate cost estimates and consistently meeting these estimates are key to creating high levels of customer satisfaction with dealer after-sales service. Satisfaction among vehicle owners who claim the actual service costs were the same or less than the original estimate is 828—which is higher than among owners who say they received no estimate (805)or that the actual costs were higher than the estimate (746).

“Service customers are particularly sensitive about the transparency of the service, notably through receiving accurate cost estimates and how well dealerships are meeting their initial commitments before service begins,” said Arora. “In 2012, 82 percent of customers received cost estimates, which is the lowest rate in the past five years, making this a critical-to-satisfaction area in which dealers may need to pay greater attention going forward.”

Customers also value efforts made by service advisors toconduct a physical inspection of their vehicle, both before and after service. Satisfaction among customers who report that their service advisor performed both a walk-around/ multi-point inspection before taking the vehicle in for service and then reviewed the work performed on the vehicle at the pick-up stage is considerably higher (833) than among those who report either a partial inspection (i.e., either pre- or post-service) or no physical inspection (764).

In addition, the study finds that brand advocacy and loyalty are closely related to satisfaction with the overall service performance of the dealer. Nearly nine of 10 customers (89%) who say they are “delighted” with dealer service (providing a rating of 10 on a 10-point scale) have made at least one positive recommendation about their service dealer. Conversely, among the 28 percent of customers who say they are “disappointed” (providing a rating of five or below) 33 percent have made at least one negative recommendation.

“Transparency and quality of work performed are building blocks of trust between service customers and authorized service centers, which drives customer satisfaction and, in turn, translates into increased brand advocacy and customer retention,” said Arora.

The 2012 Philippines Customer Service Index (CSI) Study is based on responses from 1,822 vehicle owners who purchased their vehicle between February 2010 and May 2011 and took their vehicle for service to an authorized dealer or service center between August 2011 and May 2012. The study was fielded between February 2012 and May 2012, and comprised evaluations with 70 models.

About J.D. Power Asia Pacific

J.D. Power Asia Pacific has offices in Tokyo, Singapore, Beijing, Shanghai and Bangkok that conduct customer satisfaction research and provide performance analytics services in the automotive, information technology and finance industries. Together, the five offices bring the language of customer satisfaction to consumers and businesses in Australia, China, India,Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam. Information regarding J.D. Power Asia Pacific and its products can be accessed through the Internet at www.jdpower.com.

Media Contact

Fleishman-Hillard
Christine Sarmiento –Tria
0928.5524759
christine.tria@fleishman.com

WIRED vs WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK (LAN)

Last October 22, 2010, my employer (other group of companies) requested me to make a budget proposal for the expenses needed in having an internet connection which is either a wired or wireless Local Area Network (LAN) from their previous room (where the dsl and router installed) to their new area or office room. It is not advisable then to tranfer the dsl connection and wireless & wired router because the’re still users who will be connecting in the network. The existing wifi of their PCs are also can’t  access to the wireless network because of obstructions like walls that can greatly reduce their range.
In preparation for the budget, I have to consider the area or location, speed or bandwidth of DSL applied, cost and quantity and quality of materials that will be use and of course the flexibility & convience of the users.
The budget proposal that I have made for the Local Area Network (LAN) internet connection is with details as follows:
Option 1 – Wired Local Area Network (LAN) Internet Connection
Users 1 & 2 requires a 93 meters UTP Cable-Digilink (Branded) with a cost of one thousand six hundred sixty pesos (Php.1,660.00) and 4 pieces RJ-45 with a cost of forty pesos (Php.40.00). Option 1 requires a total budgeted cost of one thousand seven hundred pesos (Php.1,700.00).Option 2 – Wireless Local Area Network (LAN) Internet Connection

It requires a 35 meters UTP Cable-Digilink (Branded) for a cost of seven hundred pesos (Php.700.00), 2 pieces RJ-45 with a cost of twenty pesos (Php.20.00) and 1 set Access Point (Wireless-Linksys) with a cost of two thousand nine hundred (Php.2,900.00), more or less. Option 2 requires a total budgeted  cost of three thousand six hundred thirty pesos (Php.3,630.00), more or less.Which is better – wired or wireless? The statement(wired vs wireless) below summarizes the main criteria we’ve considered in this blog. If you are very cost-conscious, need maximum performance of your home or small office system, and don’t care much about mobility, then a wired Ethernet LAN is probably right for you.If on the other hand, cost is less of an issue, you like being an early adopter of leading-edge technologies, and you are really concerned about the task of wiring your home or small business with Ethernet cable, then you should certainly consider a wireless LAN.

Wired vs Wireless

For wired LAN, installation is moderate difficulty; cost is less expensive, reliability is high reasonably; performance is very good; security is reasonably good and mobility is limited.

On the other hand, wireless LAN, installation is easier but beware interference; cost is more expensive; reliability is high; performance is good; security is reasonably good and its mobility is outstanding.

For the management, I will suggest that  Option 1-Wired LAN is preferable in terms of connection which has a very good performance and cost is less expensive.

But still, the decision is upon the descretion of the management on which LAN connection they will prefer and best suitable to their networking requirements.